A Modest Proposal

Obamacare mandates that health insurance companies use 85% of their premiums to pay for health care, allowing only 15% for overhead and reserves. Since lots of people think this is a good idea, I suggest we apply the same reasoning to the government. If we do, we can achieve a major reduction in the deficit without anyone paying higher taxes and without any decrease in services.

How do we do this?

In fiscal 2012, the Federal government spent $451.9 billion on welfare. Since only 30 cents on the dollar goes to recipients of government assistance (in contrast to private charities, where 70 cents of the dollar makes it to the recipients), that means that only $135.57 billion made it to the recipients, with the remainder eaten up by bureaucracy (overhead).

Using the standards of Obamacare, $135.57 billion should be 85% of the total spent on welfare. Doing the math, that means that we should add $23.92 billion for overhead, the 15% of the total that private companies are allowed to have, for a grand total of $159.49 billion. Subtracted from the current amount of $451.9 billion, and you get a savings of  $292.41 billion.

Just think, simply by applying the genius of Obamacare’s health insurance rules to the government, we can shrink the deficit by over a quarter without cutting any services or spending, simply by streamlining bureaucracy and overhead the way the government is demanding private companies do it.

I know, you think it’ll never work because the government has to have more bureaucracy than a private business. But that is to argue that the government can never be as efficient as private business, and if that’s the case, shouldn’t we be looking for private sector solutions to problems rather than adding more bureaucracies and departments to the government?

I say we should have them play by the same rules as the private sector. If we can obtain nearly $300 billion in savings just from welfare, imagine what we could do if we did the same throughout the government!

That would be change we could believe in.

Common Sense Economics

It’s been a while since I’ve posted anything specifically for the blog—the start of the new semester and a heavy teaching load has taken its toll, I’m afraid—so I thought it would be a good time to post on a few books I’ve read lately on economics that cut through a lot of the clutter and rhetoric we hear regularly today and that will give you a good grounding in basic economic theory and what works in the real world.

The first book is Common Sense Economics: What Everyone Should Know About Wealth and Prosperity, by James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Dwight R. Lee, and Tawni H. Ferrarini. The book lays out in clear and simple terms key elements of basic economics. (If you think that sounds boring, you need an attitude check: how can you even begin to vote intelligently in an election in which the economy is a major issue if you are clueless about how it works?)

Part one covers Twelve Key Elements of Economics:

1. Incentives matter.
2. There is no such thing as a free lunch.
3. Decisions are made at the margin.
4. Trade promotes economic progress.
5. Transaction costs are an obstacle to trade.
6. Prices bring the choices of buyers and sellers into balance.
7. Profits direct businesses toward activities that increase wealth.
8. People earn income by helping others.
9. Production of goods and services people value, not just jobs, provides the source of high living standards.
10. Economic progress comes primarily through trade, investment, better ways of doing things, and sound economic institutions.
11. The “invisible hand” of market prices directs buyers and sellers toward activities that promote the general welfare.
12. Too often the long-term consequences, or secondary effects, of an action are ignored.

Part two covers Seven Major Sources of Economic Progress:

1. Legal system: The foundation for economic progress is a legal system that protects privately owned property and enforces contracts in an evenhanded manner.
2. Competitive markets: Competition promotes the efficient use of resources and provides continuous stimulus for innovative improvements.
3. Limits on government regulation: Regulatory policies that reduce trade also retard economic growth.
4. An efficient capital market: To realize its potential, a nation must have a mechanism that channels capital into wealth-creating projects.
5. Monetary stability: A stable monetary policy is essential for the control of inflation, efficient allocation of investment, and achievement of economic stability.
6. Low tax rates: People will produce more when they are permitted to keep more of what they earn.
7. Free trade: A nation progresses by selling goods and services that it can produce at a relatively low cost and buying those that would be costly to produce domestically.

Part three covers Ten Elements of Clear Thinking About Economic Progress and the Role of Government:

1. Government promotes economic progress by protecting the rights of individuals and supplying a few goods that are difficult to provide through markets.
2. Allocation through political voting is fundamentally different from market allocation, and economic analysis indicates that the latter is more consistent with economic progress.
3. The costs of government are not only taxes.
4. Unless restrained by constitutional rules, special-interest groups will use the democratic political process to fleece taxpayers and consumers.
5. Unless restrained by constitutional rules, legislators will run budget deficits and spend exclusively.
6. Government slows economic progress when it becomes heavily involved in providing favors to some at the expense of others.
7. The net gain to those receiving government transfers is less, and often substantially less, than the amount they receive.
8. Central planning replaces markets with politics, which wastes resources and retards economic progress.
9. Competition is just as important in government as in markets.
10. Constitutional rules that bring the political process and sound economics into harmony will promote economic growth.

Lastly, part four covers Twelve Key Elements of Practical Personal Finance:

1. Discover your competitive advantage.
2. Be entrepreneurial. In a market economy, people get ahead by helping others and discovering better ways of doing things.
3. Use budgeting to help you save regularly and spend your money more effectively.
4. Don’t finance anything for longer than its useful life.
5. Two ways to get more out of your money: Avoid credit-card debt and consider purchasing used items.
6. Begin paying into a “real-world” savings account every month.
7. Put the power of compound interest to work for you.
8. Diversify—don’t put all of your eggs in one basket.
9. Indexed equity funds can help you beat the experts without taking excessive risk.
10. Invest in stocks for long-run objectives, but as the need for money approaches, increase the proportion of bonds.
11. Beware of investment schemes promising high returns with little or no risk.
12. Teach your children how to earn money and spend it wisely.

This is a long list of principles, many of which you may already know. For most of us, however, there are important principles to be learned that have huge implications for our personal lives as well as for how we view government policies. (This is an equal opportunity problem—both parties in the U.S. regularly violate key principles outlined in this book.)

I was particularly struck by the discussion of the importance of information and the connection between information and prices. This goes a long way toward explaining why centrally planned economies have never worked.

All in all, this is a short book, easy to understand, that will bring you up to speed quickly on key ideas in economics. Highly recommended.

Next up: books on moral and theological arguments related to economics. Stay tuned.